Grasp the Gospel — Bible Comprehension Quizzes

Genesis 26 Study Notes

← Take the quiz instead

General

True or False: According to Genesis 26:8-11, Abimelech discovered that Rebekah was actually Isaac's wife by seeing Isaac caressing her, and he then issued a decree protecting both of them from harm.

Answer: True

After Isaac had been in Gerar for some time, Abimelech happened to glance out his window and noticed Isaac showing open affection toward Rebekah, immediately revealing that the two were married rather than merely siblings (26:8). When confronted, Isaac admits his fear was the reason for the lie (26:9), and Abimelech, recognizing the danger Isaac's deception could have caused if someone had taken Rebekah as a wife, issues a decree protecting them both from harm (26:10-11). Once again, as with Abraham before him, it is a pagan king, not Isaac himself, who first raises the moral seriousness of the deception, and it is God's providence working through that king that shields Isaac's family from the very danger his own fear-driven lie had created.

  • Genesis 26:8-9 (BSB)
    “When Isaac had been there a long time, Abimelech king of the Philistines looked down from the window and was surprised to see Isaac caressing his wife Rebekah. Abimelech sent for Isaac and said, “So she is really your wife! How could you say, ‘She is my sister’?” Isaac replied, “Because I thought I might die on account of her.””
    Abimelech discovers the truth about Isaac and Rebekah's marriage.
  • Genesis 26:10-11 (BSB)
    ““What is this you have done to us?” asked Abimelech. “One of the people could easily have slept with your wife, and you would have brought guilt upon us.” So Abimelech warned all the people, saying, “Whoever harms this man or his wife will surely be put to death.””
    Abimelech rebukes Isaac and then issues a decree protecting Isaac and Rebekah.
  • Genesis 20:6 (BSB)
    “Then God said to Abimelech in the dream, “Yes, I know that you did this with a clear conscience, and so I have kept you from sinning against Me. That is why I did not let you touch her.”
    Records God's earlier, similar providential protection through this same king when Abraham told the identical lie.
  • Proverbs 21:1 (BSB)
    “The king’s heart is a waterway in the hand of the LORD; He directs it where He pleases.”
    States the principle at work in both episodes: God directs even a pagan king's actions toward His own protective purposes.

Theological

True or False: Unlike God's earlier protection of Sarah from Abimelech in Genesis 20:6, Genesis 26:8-11 shows Abimelech taking no protective action after discovering that Rebekah was truly Isaac's wife.

Answer: False

This is false. Once Abimelech discovers that Rebekah is truly Isaac's wife, he responds by decreeing a death penalty for anyone who harms either of them (26:10-11), a protective action that closely parallels God's own earlier work through this same king a generation before, when He kept Abimelech from touching Sarah despite Abraham's identical deception (Genesis 20:6). In both cases, the safety of the covenant family does not rest on the patriarch's own faithfulness but on God working through circumstances, and even through a pagan ruler, to prevent the harm that fear-driven deception could otherwise have caused. Proverbs 21:1 names this pattern as a general principle: even a king's heart lies in the LORD's hand, directed according to His purposes. None of this excuses Isaac's lie; it simply shows that God's covenant purposes are not derailed by the failures of the very people carrying them forward.

  • Genesis 26:8-9 (BSB)
    “When Isaac had been there a long time, Abimelech king of the Philistines looked down from the window and was surprised to see Isaac caressing his wife Rebekah. Abimelech sent for Isaac and said, “So she is really your wife! How could you say, ‘She is my sister’?” Isaac replied, “Because I thought I might die on account of her.””
    Abimelech discovers the truth about Isaac and Rebekah's marriage.
  • Genesis 26:10-11 (BSB)
    ““What is this you have done to us?” asked Abimelech. “One of the people could easily have slept with your wife, and you would have brought guilt upon us.” So Abimelech warned all the people, saying, “Whoever harms this man or his wife will surely be put to death.””
    Abimelech rebukes Isaac and then issues a decree protecting Isaac and Rebekah.
  • Genesis 20:6 (BSB)
    “Then God said to Abimelech in the dream, “Yes, I know that you did this with a clear conscience, and so I have kept you from sinning against Me. That is why I did not let you touch her.”
    Records God's earlier, similar providential protection through this same king when Abraham told the identical lie.
  • Proverbs 21:1 (BSB)
    “The king’s heart is a waterway in the hand of the LORD; He directs it where He pleases.”
    States the principle at work in both episodes: God directs even a pagan king's actions toward His own protective purposes.

General

According to Genesis 26:26-31, why did Abimelech come to Isaac at Beersheba, and what did the two men do together?

Answer: Abimelech, recognizing the LORD was with Isaac, sought a covenant of peace, and the two swore an oath together after a shared feast

Abimelech travels to Isaac at Beersheba with his adviser and military commander, and when Isaac asks why they have come after having sent him away, Abimelech explains that it is now obvious to him that God has favored Isaac, and so he proposes a formal covenant of peace between them (26:26-29). Isaac prepares a feast, they eat and drink together, and the next morning both parties swear an oath to one another before Isaac sends them off in peace (26:30-31). This scene closely parallels an earlier treaty Abraham himself made with an Abimelech at this same location, suggesting either the same king or a successor acting in the same pattern established a generation before.

  • Genesis 26:28-29 (BSB)
    ““We can plainly see that the LORD has been with you,” they replied. “We recommend that there should now be an oath between us and you. Let us make a covenant with you that you will not harm us, just as we have not harmed you but have done only good to you, sending you on your way in peace. And now you are blessed by the LORD.””
    Abimelech's proposal of a covenant of peace with Isaac.
  • Genesis 26:31 (BSB)
    “And they got up early the next morning and swore an oath to each other. Then Isaac sent them on their way, and they left him in peace.”
    The oath sworn between Isaac and Abimelech, completing the covenant of peace.
  • Genesis 21:22-24 (BSB)
    “At that time Abimelech and Phicol the commander of his army said to Abraham, “God is with you in all that you do. Now, therefore, swear to me here before God that you will not deal falsely with me or my children or descendants. Show to me and to the country in which you reside the same kindness that I have shown to you.” And Abraham replied, “I swear it.””
    Abraham's own earlier treaty proposal from an Abimelech, closely paralleling this later scene.
  • Genesis 21:27-32 (BSB)
    “So Abraham brought sheep and cattle and gave them to Abimelech, and the two men made a covenant. Abraham separated seven ewe lambs from the flock, and Abimelech asked him, “Why have you set apart these seven ewe lambs?” He replied, “You are to accept the seven ewe lambs from my hand as my witness that I dug this well.” So that place was called Beersheba, because it was there that the two of them swore an oath. After they had made the covenant at Beersheba, Abimelech and Phicol the commander of his army got up and returned to the land of the Philistines.”
    Records the completion of Abraham's earlier treaty at this same site of Beersheba.
  • Proverbs 16:7 (BSB)
    “When a man’s ways please the LORD, He makes even the man’s enemies live at peace with him.”
    States the principle both treaty scenes illustrate: God's favor can turn even potential rivals toward peace.

Theological

Abimelech's treaty with Isaac at Beersheba (26:26-31) closely mirrors Abraham's earlier treaty with an Abimelech at the same site (Genesis 21:22-32). What does this near-repetition suggest?

Answer: God's covenant blessing on the patriarchs was visible enough to outsiders to prompt the same response of seeking peace in successive generations

The strong parallel between Abimelech's treaty with Isaac (26:26-31) and Abraham's earlier treaty with an Abimelech at the very same location (Genesis 21:22-32) is unlikely to be coincidental within the text's own logic: in both cases, a Philistine ruler explicitly acknowledges that the LORD is with the patriarch before him and seeks peace on that basis, rather than attempting to suppress or destroy a rival power. Proverbs 16:7 states the underlying principle plainly: conduct that pleases God can turn even a person's rivals into allies at peace with them. Whether or not this is the same individual Abimelech from Abraham's generation, the repetition across two generations reinforces the same lesson twice: God's covenant blessing on the patriarchal family is visible enough, even to outsiders, to reshape how surrounding nations choose to relate to them.

  • Genesis 26:28-29 (BSB)
    ““We can plainly see that the LORD has been with you,” they replied. “We recommend that there should now be an oath between us and you. Let us make a covenant with you that you will not harm us, just as we have not harmed you but have done only good to you, sending you on your way in peace. And now you are blessed by the LORD.””
    Abimelech's proposal of a covenant of peace with Isaac.
  • Genesis 26:31 (BSB)
    “And they got up early the next morning and swore an oath to each other. Then Isaac sent them on their way, and they left him in peace.”
    The oath sworn between Isaac and Abimelech, completing the covenant of peace.
  • Genesis 21:22-24 (BSB)
    “At that time Abimelech and Phicol the commander of his army said to Abraham, “God is with you in all that you do. Now, therefore, swear to me here before God that you will not deal falsely with me or my children or descendants. Show to me and to the country in which you reside the same kindness that I have shown to you.” And Abraham replied, “I swear it.””
    Abraham's own earlier treaty proposal from an Abimelech, closely paralleling this later scene.
  • Genesis 21:27-32 (BSB)
    “So Abraham brought sheep and cattle and gave them to Abimelech, and the two men made a covenant. Abraham separated seven ewe lambs from the flock, and Abimelech asked him, “Why have you set apart these seven ewe lambs?” He replied, “You are to accept the seven ewe lambs from my hand as my witness that I dug this well.” So that place was called Beersheba, because it was there that the two of them swore an oath. After they had made the covenant at Beersheba, Abimelech and Phicol the commander of his army got up and returned to the land of the Philistines.”
    Records the completion of Abraham's earlier treaty at this same site of Beersheba.
  • Proverbs 16:7 (BSB)
    “When a man’s ways please the LORD, He makes even the man’s enemies live at peace with him.”
    States the principle both treaty scenes illustrate: God's favor can turn even potential rivals toward peace.

General

True or False: According to Genesis 26:32-33, Isaac's servants found water on the very same day of the covenant oath with Abimelech, and Isaac named that well Shibah, giving the city its name Beersheba.

Answer: True

On the same day the oath with Abimelech was sworn, Isaac's servants come to report success in the digging project they had been working on (26:32). Isaac names this well Shibah, and the text notes that this is why the city is called Beersheba to this day (26:33). This naming reinforces the connection between the newly sworn oath and the site's name, tying together the themes of water, provision, and covenant peace that run through the surrounding verses.

  • Genesis 26:32-33 (BSB)
    “On that same day, Isaac’s servants came and told him about the well they had dug. “We have found water!” they told him. So he called it Shibah, and to this day the name of the city is Beersheba.”
    The naming of the well Shibah, giving the city its lasting name Beersheba.
  • Genesis 21:31 (BSB)
    “So that place was called Beersheba, because it was there that the two of them swore an oath.”
    Records the earlier naming of Beersheba a generation before, tied to Abraham's own oath with Abimelech.
  • Deuteronomy 6:13 (BSB)
    “Fear the LORD your God, serve Him only, and take your oaths in His name.”
    Reflects the seriousness of oath-taking in the LORD's name that this site's name commemorates.

Theological

True or False: The naming of Beersheba in Genesis 26:32-33 introduces an entirely new place name unrelated to any earlier naming of the same site in Genesis.

Answer: False

This is false. Genesis had already recorded the naming of Beersheba once before, when Abraham and an earlier Abimelech swore an oath there and the site was named for that very oath (Genesis 21:31). Isaac's own naming of the well as Shibah in this chapter (26:32-33) reaffirms rather than replaces that earlier association, tying the city's name once again to a sworn oath of peace between the patriarchal family and the Philistines. Deuteronomy 6:13 reflects the broader seriousness of swearing oaths by God's own name as a binding act, which fits why this location becomes associated with covenant oaths across two successive generations rather than only one.

  • Genesis 26:32-33 (BSB)
    “On that same day, Isaac’s servants came and told him about the well they had dug. “We have found water!” they told him. So he called it Shibah, and to this day the name of the city is Beersheba.”
    The naming of the well Shibah, giving the city its lasting name Beersheba.
  • Genesis 21:31 (BSB)
    “So that place was called Beersheba, because it was there that the two of them swore an oath.”
    Records the earlier naming of Beersheba a generation before, tied to Abraham's own oath with Abimelech.
  • Deuteronomy 6:13 (BSB)
    “Fear the LORD your God, serve Him only, and take your oaths in His name.”
    Reflects the seriousness of oath-taking in the LORD's name that this site's name commemorates.

General

According to Genesis 26:3-5, on what basis does God renew His covenant promise directly to Isaac?

Answer: Because of the oath God had sworn to Abraham, whose obedience is specifically recalled

In the same appearance where God tells Isaac to stay in the land, He goes on to renew, for the first time directly to Isaac himself, the covenant promise first given to Abraham: land for his descendants, a vast future population for his line, and blessing reaching out through his offspring to every nation (26:3-4). Crucially, the passage grounds this renewal not in anything Isaac has yet done, but in Abraham's earlier obedience — because Abraham had listened to God and kept His instructions faithfully (26:5). Isaac inherits a promise resting on his father's history with God, even as it becomes, from this point on, a promise God speaks to Isaac personally rather than only to Abraham on Isaac's behalf.

  • Genesis 26:3-5 (BSB)
    “Stay in this land as a foreigner, and I will be with you and bless you. For I will give all these lands to you and your offspring, and I will confirm the oath that I swore to your father Abraham. I will make your descendants as numerous as the stars in the sky, and I will give them all these lands, and through your offspring all nations of the earth will be blessed, because Abraham listened to My voice and kept My charge, My commandments, My statutes, and My laws.””
    God renews the full Abrahamic covenant directly and personally to Isaac, grounded in Abraham's earlier obedience.
  • Genesis 22:16-18 (BSB)
    “saying, “By Myself I have sworn, declares the LORD, that because you have done this and have not withheld your only son, I will surely bless you, and I will multiply your descendants like the stars in the sky and the sand on the seashore. Your descendants will possess the gates of their enemies. And through your offspring all nations of the earth will be blessed, because you have obeyed My voice.””
    Records the original oath to Abraham that God now confirms directly to Isaac.
  • Psalm 105:9-10 (BSB)
    “the covenant He made with Abraham, and the oath He swore to Isaac. He confirmed it to Jacob as a decree, to Israel as an everlasting covenant:”
    Summarizes this same covenant as one continuous promise passing from Abraham to Isaac to Jacob.
  • Deuteronomy 7:9 (BSB)
    “Know therefore that the LORD your God is God, the faithful God who keeps His covenant of loving devotion for a thousand generations of those who love Him and keep His commandments.”
    States the general principle this renewal illustrates: God's covenant loyalty extends reliably across generations.

Theological

Genesis 26:3-5 renews the Abrahamic covenant directly to Isaac. How does this covenant renewal relate to God's earlier dealings with Abraham?

Answer: It shows the covenant carried forward as a multi-generational reality, grounded in Abraham's obedience yet now spoken personally to the next generation

This renewal is significant for how it frames covenant continuity: God explicitly ties His promise to Isaac back to Abraham's obedience (26:5), showing the covenant is not simply reissued from scratch to each generation independently, but carried forward as a single, ongoing relationship God sustains across time. At the same time, the promise is now spoken directly to Isaac rather than merely inherited secondhand, marking him out personally as the one through whom the line of promise continues. Genesis 22:16-18 records the original oath in view here, sworn to Abraham specifically because of his obedience at the binding of Isaac, and Psalm 105:9-10 later summarizes this same covenant as passing in turn from Abraham to Isaac to Jacob as one continuous, everlasting decree. Deuteronomy 7:9 states the general principle this narrative illustrates: God keeps covenant loyally across generations, not merely within a single lifetime.

  • Genesis 26:3-5 (BSB)
    “Stay in this land as a foreigner, and I will be with you and bless you. For I will give all these lands to you and your offspring, and I will confirm the oath that I swore to your father Abraham. I will make your descendants as numerous as the stars in the sky, and I will give them all these lands, and through your offspring all nations of the earth will be blessed, because Abraham listened to My voice and kept My charge, My commandments, My statutes, and My laws.””
    God renews the full Abrahamic covenant directly and personally to Isaac, grounded in Abraham's earlier obedience.
  • Genesis 22:16-18 (BSB)
    “saying, “By Myself I have sworn, declares the LORD, that because you have done this and have not withheld your only son, I will surely bless you, and I will multiply your descendants like the stars in the sky and the sand on the seashore. Your descendants will possess the gates of their enemies. And through your offspring all nations of the earth will be blessed, because you have obeyed My voice.””
    Records the original oath to Abraham that God now confirms directly to Isaac.
  • Psalm 105:9-10 (BSB)
    “the covenant He made with Abraham, and the oath He swore to Isaac. He confirmed it to Jacob as a decree, to Israel as an everlasting covenant:”
    Summarizes this same covenant as one continuous promise passing from Abraham to Isaac to Jacob.
  • Deuteronomy 7:9 (BSB)
    “Know therefore that the LORD your God is God, the faithful God who keeps His covenant of loving devotion for a thousand generations of those who love Him and keep His commandments.”
    States the general principle this renewal illustrates: God's covenant loyalty extends reliably across generations.

General

True or False: According to Genesis 26:34-35, Esau married two Hittite women when he was forty years old, and this caused his parents deep distress.

Answer: True

The chapter closes with a brief but consequential note: at forty years old, Esau takes two Hittite women, Judith and Basemath, as his wives, and the text states plainly that they caused grief to both Isaac and Rebekah (26:34-35). No further explanation is given here for why these marriages caused such distress, but the fact that Genesis records it at all signals that this detail matters for what follows. This brief, almost throwaway-sounding note quietly plants the family tension that will shape the next chapter's events.

  • Genesis 26:34-35 (BSB)
    “When Esau was forty years old, he took as his wives Judith daughter of Beeri the Hittite and Basemath daughter of Elon the Hittite. And they brought grief to Isaac and Rebekah.”
    Esau's marriages to two Hittite women and the grief they caused his parents.
  • Genesis 24:3 (BSB)
    “and I will have you swear by the LORD, the God of heaven and the God of earth, that you will not take a wife for my son from the daughters of the Canaanites among whom I am dwelling,”
    Records Abraham's earlier instruction establishing the family's expectation of marrying outside the Canaanite population.
  • Genesis 28:1 (BSB)
    “So Isaac called for Jacob and blessed him. “Do not take a wife from the Canaanite women,” he commanded.”
    Shows Isaac giving Jacob the same instruction directly, a response to Esau's earlier marriages.
  • 2 Corinthians 6:14 (BSB)
    “Do not be unequally yoked with unbelievers. For what partnership can righteousness have with wickedness? Or what fellowship does light have with darkness?”
    States a related principle for God's people generally about close partnership with those outside the faith.

Theological

True or False: Esau's marriages to Hittite women (26:34-35) stood in continuity with an established family expectation that the covenant line would seek wives from within their own people rather than from the surrounding Canaanite population.

Answer: False

This is false. Esau's marriages actually broke with the family's established expectation rather than continuing it. Abraham had earlier made his servant swear that Isaac's bride would not come from the Canaanite population (Genesis 24:3), and Isaac will soon give Jacob the same instruction explicitly (28:1). Esau's choice to marry two Hittite women instead departs from this pattern, and the grief it causes his parents (26:34-35) reflects the seriousness with which this family treated marriage outside their own covenant community. 2 Corinthians 6:14 later states a related principle for God's people generally, cautioning against being joined in close partnership with those who do not share the same faith and loyalties. Esau's marriages here are the immediate occasion for the instruction Isaac gives Jacob in the very next chapter.

  • Genesis 26:34-35 (BSB)
    “When Esau was forty years old, he took as his wives Judith daughter of Beeri the Hittite and Basemath daughter of Elon the Hittite. And they brought grief to Isaac and Rebekah.”
    Esau's marriages to two Hittite women and the grief they caused his parents.
  • Genesis 24:3 (BSB)
    “and I will have you swear by the LORD, the God of heaven and the God of earth, that you will not take a wife for my son from the daughters of the Canaanites among whom I am dwelling,”
    Records Abraham's earlier instruction establishing the family's expectation of marrying outside the Canaanite population.
  • Genesis 28:1 (BSB)
    “So Isaac called for Jacob and blessed him. “Do not take a wife from the Canaanite women,” he commanded.”
    Shows Isaac giving Jacob the same instruction directly, a response to Esau's earlier marriages.
  • 2 Corinthians 6:14 (BSB)
    “Do not be unequally yoked with unbelievers. For what partnership can righteousness have with wickedness? Or what fellowship does light have with darkness?”
    States a related principle for God's people generally about close partnership with those outside the faith.

General

When a famine struck the land in Isaac's time, what specific instruction did the LORD give him?

Answer: Stay out of Egypt entirely, and remain instead wherever God pointed him toward

Isaac faced a famine much like the earlier shortage that struck during Abraham's day, and his first move was toward Abimelech's territory at Gerar (26:1). It was then that God spoke to him directly, with a specific command: unlike Abraham, who had once traveled to Egypt during a famine of his own, Isaac was to avoid that path and remain right where he was, settling exactly as God directed (26:2). The test here is one of trust — Egypt would have looked like the obvious, practical solution to a food shortage, but God calls Isaac to stay within the land of promise and depend on Him there instead of on a foreign nation's resources.

  • Genesis 26:1 (BSB)
    “Now there was another famine in the land, subsequent to the one that had occurred in Abraham’s time. And Isaac went to Abimelech king of the Philistines at Gerar.”
    The famine that prompts Isaac's move toward Gerar, echoing the famine Abraham once faced.
  • Genesis 26:2 (BSB)
    “The LORD appeared to Isaac and said, “Do not go down to Egypt. Settle in the land where I tell you.”
    God's direct instruction to Isaac not to repeat Abraham's earlier move to Egypt.
  • Genesis 12:10 (BSB)
    “Now there was a famine in the land. So Abram went down to Egypt to live there for a while because the famine was severe.”
    Recalls the earlier famine-driven move to Egypt that God now tells Isaac not to repeat.
  • Isaiah 31:1 (BSB)
    “Woe to those who go down to Egypt for help, who rely on horses, who trust in their abundance of chariots and in their multitude of horsemen. They do not look to the Holy One of Israel; they do not seek the LORD.”
    Later prophetic warning against treating Egypt as a substitute for trusting the LORD, the same temptation Isaac faced.
  • Psalm 37:3 (BSB)
    “Trust in the LORD and do good; dwell in the land and cultivate faithfulness.”
    States the positive alternative God gives Isaac: trust and remain, rather than seek security elsewhere.

Theological

Genesis 26:1-2 presents Isaac facing the same test his father once faced: a famine, with Egypt as the obvious recourse. What theological point does God's specific prohibition make?

Answer: Reliance on the land of promise, not on Egypt's resources, is the substance of the trust God calls for

Isaac's famine (26:1) sets up a deliberate echo of Abraham's own famine-driven trip to Egypt, but God's command reverses the pattern: rather than permitting the same move, He instructs Isaac to remain right there and settle where directed (26:2). The point is not that Egypt is forbidden ground for God's people at every moment in redemptive history — a later famine will in fact send Jacob's family there under God's own provision — but that at this particular juncture, staying put is itself the substance of the trust God requires of Isaac. Isaiah 31:1 later condemns exactly the temptation this passage anticipates, seeking security in Egypt's resources rather than in God Himself. Psalm 37:3 then states the positive alternative: trusting God is inseparable from remaining faithfully where He has placed you.

  • Genesis 26:1 (BSB)
    “Now there was another famine in the land, subsequent to the one that had occurred in Abraham’s time. And Isaac went to Abimelech king of the Philistines at Gerar.”
    The famine that prompts Isaac's move toward Gerar, echoing the famine Abraham once faced.
  • Genesis 26:2 (BSB)
    “The LORD appeared to Isaac and said, “Do not go down to Egypt. Settle in the land where I tell you.”
    God's direct instruction to Isaac not to repeat Abraham's earlier move to Egypt.
  • Genesis 12:10 (BSB)
    “Now there was a famine in the land. So Abram went down to Egypt to live there for a while because the famine was severe.”
    Recalls the earlier famine-driven move to Egypt that God now tells Isaac not to repeat.
  • Isaiah 31:1 (BSB)
    “Woe to those who go down to Egypt for help, who rely on horses, who trust in their abundance of chariots and in their multitude of horsemen. They do not look to the Holy One of Israel; they do not seek the LORD.”
    Later prophetic warning against treating Egypt as a substitute for trusting the LORD, the same temptation Isaac faced.
  • Psalm 37:3 (BSB)
    “Trust in the LORD and do good; dwell in the land and cultivate faithfulness.”
    States the positive alternative God gives Isaac: trust and remain, rather than seek security elsewhere.

General

According to Genesis 26:23-25, what did God say to Isaac the night he arrived at Beersheba?

Answer: That He is the God of Abraham, that Isaac should not be afraid, and that He would bless him for Abraham's sake

Isaac travels onward from the wells to Beersheba, where God appears to him that very night, identifying Himself as the God who had known Isaac's father, telling Isaac not to be afraid because God is with him, and promising to bless him and multiply his descendants for Abraham's sake (26:23-24). In response, Isaac builds an altar there, worships the LORD openly, pitches his tent, and his servants dig yet another well (26:25). This appearance functions as a fresh, personal reassurance at exactly the point where Isaac may have felt most unsettled, having just been displaced from Gerar and having endured two contested wells before finally reaching a place of rest.

  • Genesis 26:23-24 (BSB)
    “From there Isaac went up to Beersheba, and that night the LORD appeared to him and said, “I am the God of your father Abraham. Do not be afraid, for I am with you. I will bless you and multiply your descendants for the sake of My servant Abraham.””
    God's fresh appearance and reassurance to Isaac at Beersheba.
  • Genesis 26:25 (BSB)
    “So Isaac built an altar there and called on the name of the LORD, and he pitched his tent there. His servants also dug a well there.”
    Isaac's response of worship after God's appearance.
  • Psalm 105:9-10 (BSB)
    “the covenant He made with Abraham, and the oath He swore to Isaac. He confirmed it to Jacob as a decree, to Israel as an everlasting covenant:”
    Summarizes this covenant as a single, unbroken thread from Abraham through Isaac to Jacob.
  • Genesis 12:7 (BSB)
    “Then the LORD appeared to Abram and said, “I will give this land to your offspring.” So Abram built an altar there to the LORD, who had appeared to him.”
    Shows Abram responding to God's appearance with the same pattern of altar-building Isaac now follows.

Theological

God's appearance to Isaac at Beersheba (26:23-24), immediately following the well disputes, reaffirms the covenant with language echoing His earlier promise. What is significant about the timing of this reassurance?

Answer: It comes right after a season of yielding and hardship, showing God's covenant faithfulness is not contingent on Isaac's circumstances appearing settled or secure

The timing of God's appearance at Beersheba (26:23-24) is notable: it comes immediately after Isaac has been displaced from Gerar and has twice yielded contested wells rather than fought for them, seasons that could easily have felt like setbacks rather than triumphs. Yet it is precisely here that God reaffirms His covenant, echoing the same promise of blessing and descendants first given to Abraham and already renewed to Isaac earlier in the chapter (26:3-5). Isaac's response, building an altar and calling on the LORD's name (26:25), mirrors Abraham's own pattern of worship after receiving God's word (Genesis 12:7). Psalm 105:9-10 later summarizes this same covenant as an unbroken thread running from Abraham through Isaac to Jacob, underscoring that God's faithfulness to His promise does not wait for circumstances to look secure by human standards before reasserting itself.

  • Genesis 26:23-24 (BSB)
    “From there Isaac went up to Beersheba, and that night the LORD appeared to him and said, “I am the God of your father Abraham. Do not be afraid, for I am with you. I will bless you and multiply your descendants for the sake of My servant Abraham.””
    God's fresh appearance and reassurance to Isaac at Beersheba.
  • Genesis 26:25 (BSB)
    “So Isaac built an altar there and called on the name of the LORD, and he pitched his tent there. His servants also dug a well there.”
    Isaac's response of worship after God's appearance.
  • Psalm 105:9-10 (BSB)
    “the covenant He made with Abraham, and the oath He swore to Isaac. He confirmed it to Jacob as a decree, to Israel as an everlasting covenant:”
    Summarizes this covenant as a single, unbroken thread from Abraham through Isaac to Jacob.
  • Genesis 12:7 (BSB)
    “Then the LORD appeared to Abram and said, “I will give this land to your offspring.” So Abram built an altar there to the LORD, who had appeared to him.”
    Shows Abram responding to God's appearance with the same pattern of altar-building Isaac now follows.

General

According to Genesis 26:12-13, what happened when Isaac planted crops during the famine?

Answer: He reaped a hundredfold that same year, and the LORD made him increasingly wealthy

Despite the famine that had first driven Isaac toward Gerar, when he plants seed in that same land, he reaps an extraordinary hundredfold harvest, and the text is explicit that this abundance comes directly from the LORD's blessing (26:12). From there, his wealth continues to grow until he becomes exceedingly rich (26:13). This is a striking picture of provision in the middle of scarcity — even in a season the whole region was experiencing as famine, God causes Isaac's obedience in staying in the land, as He had commanded a few verses earlier, to result in remarkable abundance rather than lack.

  • Genesis 26:12-13 (BSB)
    “Now Isaac sowed seed in the land, and that very year he reaped a hundredfold. And the LORD blessed him, and he became richer and richer, until he was exceedingly wealthy.”
    Isaac's extraordinary harvest and growing wealth, attributed directly to the LORD's blessing.
  • Deuteronomy 8:18 (BSB)
    “But remember that it is the LORD your God who gives you the power to gain wealth, in order to confirm His covenant that He swore to your fathers even to this day.”
    States the general principle behind Isaac's prosperity: wealth comes from God in fulfillment of His covenant.
  • Psalm 1:3 (BSB)
    “He is like a tree planted by streams of water, yielding its fruit in season, whose leaf does not wither, and who prospers in all he does.”
    Describes the same kind of God-given fruitfulness Isaac experiences here.
  • Proverbs 10:22 (BSB)
    “The blessing of the LORD enriches, and He adds no sorrow to it.”
    Names the LORD's blessing, not human effort alone, as the true source of Isaac's enrichment.

Theological

Isaac's hundredfold harvest during a famine (26:12) directly follows his obedience to God's command to remain in the land rather than go to Egypt. What theological connection does the narrative draw here?

Answer: God's blessing on Isaac's obedience is evident in a specific, dramatic form of provision, tying the two closely together in sequence

The narrative's placement of this hundredfold harvest (26:12) immediately after Isaac's obedience to God's instruction to remain in the land (26:2-3) draws a deliberate connection: God's blessing manifests concretely, in the very domain — agricultural provision during famine — where trusting Him seemed most costly. Deuteronomy 8:18 states the underlying principle broadly: whatever ability a person has to grow prosperous ultimately traces back to God, granted so that His covenant with the patriarchs might be carried forward, not to human ingenuity operating independently of Him. Psalm 1:3 and Proverbs 10:22 both describe this same kind of God-given fruitfulness and enrichment as characteristic of a life rightly ordered toward Him. None of this turns material prosperity into a formula guaranteed to every believer in every circumstance; it simply shows, in this particular narrative, that God backed Isaac's costly obedience with visible, abundant provision.

  • Genesis 26:12-13 (BSB)
    “Now Isaac sowed seed in the land, and that very year he reaped a hundredfold. And the LORD blessed him, and he became richer and richer, until he was exceedingly wealthy.”
    Isaac's extraordinary harvest and growing wealth, attributed directly to the LORD's blessing.
  • Deuteronomy 8:18 (BSB)
    “But remember that it is the LORD your God who gives you the power to gain wealth, in order to confirm His covenant that He swore to your fathers even to this day.”
    States the general principle behind Isaac's prosperity: wealth comes from God in fulfillment of His covenant.
  • Psalm 1:3 (BSB)
    “He is like a tree planted by streams of water, yielding its fruit in season, whose leaf does not wither, and who prospers in all he does.”
    Describes the same kind of God-given fruitfulness Isaac experiences here.
  • Proverbs 10:22 (BSB)
    “The blessing of the LORD enriches, and He adds no sorrow to it.”
    Names the LORD's blessing, not human effort alone, as the true source of Isaac's enrichment.

General

According to Genesis 26:16-18, what did Isaac do after Abimelech asked him to leave Gerar because he had become too powerful?

Answer: He moved to the Valley of Gerar and reopened his father's wells, restoring the same names Abraham had used

Abimelech, unsettled by how powerful Isaac had become, asks him to leave Gerar (26:16). Isaac complies without resistance, moving his household to a nearby valley near Gerar (26:17), where he reopens the very wells his father Abraham had dug, wells the Philistines had filled in after Abraham's death, and he even restores the same names Abraham had originally given them (26:18). This act of reclaiming and renaming is more than practical water management; it is a deliberate continuation of his father's legacy, reasserting a claim already established a generation earlier rather than starting entirely from scratch.

  • Genesis 26:16 (BSB)
    “Then Abimelech said to Isaac, “Depart from us, for you are much too powerful for us.””
    Abimelech's request that Isaac leave Gerar because of his growing power.
  • Genesis 26:17-18 (BSB)
    “So Isaac left that place and encamped in the Valley of Gerar and settled there. Isaac reopened the wells that had been dug in the days of his father Abraham, which the Philistines had stopped up after Abraham died. And he gave these wells the same names his father had given them.”
    Isaac relocates and reopens his father's wells, restoring their original names.
  • Hebrews 11:9 (BSB)
    “By faith he dwelt in the promised land as a stranger in a foreign country. He lived in tents, as did Isaac and Jacob, who were heirs with him of the same promise.”
    Identifies Isaac as a fellow heir with Abraham of the very same promise, underscoring the continuity this act expresses.
  • Isaiah 58:12 (BSB)
    “Your people will rebuild the ancient ruins; you will restore the age-old foundations; you will be called Repairer of the Breach, Restorer of the Streets of Dwelling.”
    Describes the broader biblical theme of restoring what an earlier generation had established, matching Isaac's action here.

Theological

Isaac's act of reopening and renaming his father's wells (26:18) after being displaced by Abimelech carries significance beyond simple water rights. What does this act represent?

Answer: A deliberate act of claiming continuity with the covenant inheritance Abraham had already established in the land

Isaac's decision to reopen his father's wells and restore their original names (26:18), rather than simply digging fresh wells of his own, reflects more than practical necessity; it is an act of claiming continuity with the specific inheritance God had already begun establishing through Abraham in this land. Hebrews 11:9 describes Isaac as a fellow heir with Abraham of the very same promise, living as a foreigner in a land not yet fully possessed, and this well-reopening is one concrete expression of that shared inheritance being carried forward rather than restarted. Isaiah 58:12 later describes God's people restoring age-old foundations and repairing what had been broken down, a theme this small act anticipates: honoring and rebuilding what a previous generation of faith had first established, rather than treating the covenant as something to be built again from nothing in each generation.

  • Genesis 26:16 (BSB)
    “Then Abimelech said to Isaac, “Depart from us, for you are much too powerful for us.””
    Abimelech's request that Isaac leave Gerar because of his growing power.
  • Genesis 26:17-18 (BSB)
    “So Isaac left that place and encamped in the Valley of Gerar and settled there. Isaac reopened the wells that had been dug in the days of his father Abraham, which the Philistines had stopped up after Abraham died. And he gave these wells the same names his father had given them.”
    Isaac relocates and reopens his father's wells, restoring their original names.
  • Hebrews 11:9 (BSB)
    “By faith he dwelt in the promised land as a stranger in a foreign country. He lived in tents, as did Isaac and Jacob, who were heirs with him of the same promise.”
    Identifies Isaac as a fellow heir with Abraham of the very same promise, underscoring the continuity this act expresses.
  • Isaiah 58:12 (BSB)
    “Your people will rebuild the ancient ruins; you will restore the age-old foundations; you will be called Repairer of the Breach, Restorer of the Streets of Dwelling.”
    Describes the broader biblical theme of restoring what an earlier generation had established, matching Isaac's action here.

General

When the men of Gerar asked about Rebekah, what did Isaac tell them, and why?

Answer: That she was his sister, because he was afraid the local men would kill him for the sake of his beautiful wife

Isaac tells the men of Gerar that Rebekah is his sister, driven by the same fear that once gripped his father: he worries the local men would take his life because his wife is so beautiful (26:7). This is a striking moment in Genesis — it is now the third time this almost identical deception appears in the book: Abraham told the same lie about Sarah in Egypt, then told it again to this very same Abimelech at Gerar, and now his son Isaac tells the same lie about his own wife, in the same region, apparently to the same king. This repetition is not incidental; the narrative deliberately shows the pattern being handed down, fear-driven deception surfacing again in the next generation despite the promise Isaac has just received from God only verses earlier. Isaac's status as the newly reaffirmed covenant heir does not, on its own, make him immune to the same failure of trust his father displayed twice before him.

  • Genesis 26:7 (BSB)
    “But when the men of that place asked about his wife, he said, “She is my sister.” For he was afraid to say, “She is my wife,” since he thought to himself, “The men of this place will kill me on account of Rebekah, because she is so beautiful.””
    Isaac's fear-driven deception about Rebekah, echoing his father's own earlier lies.
  • Genesis 12:11-13 (BSB)
    “As he was about to enter Egypt, he said to his wife Sarai, “Look, I know that you are a beautiful woman, and when the Egyptians see you, they will say, ‘This is his wife.’ Then they will kill me but will let you live. Please say you are my sister, so that I will be treated well for your sake, and on account of you my life will be spared.””
    Abraham's first instance of this exact deception, told about Sarah in Egypt.
  • Genesis 20:2 (BSB)
    “Abraham said of his wife Sarah, “She is my sister.” So Abimelech king of Gerar had Sarah brought to him.”
    Abraham's second instance of the same deception, told to this same Abimelech at Gerar.
  • Proverbs 29:25 (BSB)
    “The fear of man is a snare, but whoever trusts in the LORD is set securely on high.”
    Names the underlying dynamic behind all three instances of this deception: fear of man overriding trust in God.

Theological

Isaac's claim that Rebekah was his sister (26:7) is the third occurrence of this exact deception in Genesis, after Abraham's use of it in Egypt and again at Gerar. What should be made of this repetition?

Answer: It exposes a fear-driven pattern of deception passed from father to son, which the narrative names plainly rather than excuses

The narrative's decision to record this deception a third time, after Abraham's own use of it in Egypt (Genesis 12) and again with this same Abimelech (Genesis 20), does real interpretive work: it names a repeated, fear-driven family pattern rather than treating Isaac's version of the lie as somehow more excusable simply because a new generation is now the one telling it. Isaac has, only a few verses earlier, received the covenant promise renewed directly and personally to himself (26:3-5); yet that fresh assurance does not immediately translate into trust when he faces a comparable threat. Proverbs 29:25 diagnoses exactly this dynamic: fear of man functions as a snare, in contrast to the security that comes from trusting the LORD. Genesis does not soften or hide this repeated failure in its covenant heirs; it simply records it plainly, letting readers see that even a chosen, promised line remains capable of the same doubts and deceptions as anyone else.

  • Genesis 26:7 (BSB)
    “But when the men of that place asked about his wife, he said, “She is my sister.” For he was afraid to say, “She is my wife,” since he thought to himself, “The men of this place will kill me on account of Rebekah, because she is so beautiful.””
    Isaac's fear-driven deception about Rebekah, echoing his father's own earlier lies.
  • Genesis 12:11-13 (BSB)
    “As he was about to enter Egypt, he said to his wife Sarai, “Look, I know that you are a beautiful woman, and when the Egyptians see you, they will say, ‘This is his wife.’ Then they will kill me but will let you live. Please say you are my sister, so that I will be treated well for your sake, and on account of you my life will be spared.””
    Abraham's first instance of this exact deception, told about Sarah in Egypt.
  • Genesis 20:2 (BSB)
    “Abraham said of his wife Sarah, “She is my sister.” So Abimelech king of Gerar had Sarah brought to him.”
    Abraham's second instance of the same deception, told to this same Abimelech at Gerar.
  • Proverbs 29:25 (BSB)
    “The fear of man is a snare, but whoever trusts in the LORD is set securely on high.”
    Names the underlying dynamic behind all three instances of this deception: fear of man overriding trust in God.

General

True or False: As Isaac's wealth grew, his Philistine neighbors responded by blocking up the wells that Abraham's servants had originally dug.

Answer: True

As Isaac's flocks, herds, and servants grew so large that his Philistine neighbors grew envious of him (26:14), their response was not confrontation but obstruction: they blocked up every well Abraham's household had first established there, years earlier (26:15). This act of quiet hostility, targeting a resource as basic as water access, reflects how deeply Isaac's prosperity had unsettled his neighbors. It also sets up the series of well disputes that follows, as Isaac's household works to reclaim and reopen the water sources his own father had first established.

  • Genesis 26:14-15 (BSB)
    “He owned so many flocks and herds and servants that the Philistines envied him. So the Philistines took dirt and stopped up all the wells that his father’s servants had dug in the days of his father Abraham.”
    The Philistines' envy of Isaac's prosperity, expressed by stopping up his father's wells.
  • Genesis 37:11 (BSB)
    “And his brothers were jealous of him, but his father kept in mind what he had said.”
    Records a comparable instance of envy toward a blessed family member, this time within the family itself.
  • James 3:16 (BSB)
    “For where jealousy and selfish ambition exist, there will be disorder and every evil practice.”
    States the general principle this episode illustrates: envy tends to produce disorder and hostile action.

Theological

True or False: The Philistines' envy toward Isaac's God-given prosperity (26:14-15) is portrayed as an isolated incident, without any comparable pattern of envy provoking hostility elsewhere in Scripture.

Answer: False

This is false. The Philistines' response to Isaac's prosperity, quietly blocking wells rather than confronting him directly (26:14-15), is a concrete instance of a pattern Scripture names repeatedly rather than an isolated incident: envy of another's blessing provoking hostile action against them. Genesis 37:11 records the same dynamic a few generations later, when Joseph's brothers grow jealous of him because of their father's favor, eventually leading to far graver harm. James 3:16 states the principle generally: wherever envy and self-serving rivalry take hold, disorder and every kind of destructive behavior tend to follow. The wells themselves are almost incidental; what the text highlights is how another's visible blessing can become the occasion for resentment rather than rejoicing, a temptation this narrative does not confine to Isaac's Philistine neighbors alone.

  • Genesis 26:14-15 (BSB)
    “He owned so many flocks and herds and servants that the Philistines envied him. So the Philistines took dirt and stopped up all the wells that his father’s servants had dug in the days of his father Abraham.”
    The Philistines' envy of Isaac's prosperity, expressed by stopping up his father's wells.
  • Genesis 37:11 (BSB)
    “And his brothers were jealous of him, but his father kept in mind what he had said.”
    Records a comparable instance of envy toward a blessed family member, this time within the family itself.
  • James 3:16 (BSB)
    “For where jealousy and selfish ambition exist, there will be disorder and every evil practice.”
    States the general principle this episode illustrates: envy tends to produce disorder and hostile action.

General

True or False: According to Genesis 26:22, Isaac's third well brought no dispute at all, and he named it Rehoboth, declaring that the LORD had finally made room for him to be fruitful.

Answer: True

After two successive wells produced conflict, Isaac moves on once more and digs a third well, and this time no one quarrels over it (26:22). He names this well Rehoboth, meaning room or open space, and explicitly credits the LORD with finally opening up room for his household to thrive there. The contrast with the two previous well names, contention and hostility, could not be sharper: after patiently yielding twice, Isaac finally reaches a place of rest and undisputed provision, and he attributes that outcome directly to God rather than to his own persistence.

  • Genesis 26:22 (BSB)
    “He moved on from there and dug another well, and they did not quarrel over it. He named it Rehoboth and said, “At last the LORD has made room for us, and we will be fruitful in the land.””
    The third well, undisputed, and Isaac's declaration crediting the LORD.
  • Psalm 118:5 (BSB)
    “In my distress I called to the LORD, and He answered and set me free.”
    Reflects the same experience of relief and open space following a season of distress.
  • Isaiah 54:2-3 (BSB)
    ““Enlarge the site of your tent, stretch out the curtains of your dwellings, do not hold back. Lengthen your ropes and drive your stakes in deep. For you will spread out to the right and left; your descendants will dispossess the nations and inhabit the desolate cities.”
    Uses the same picture of expanded space as a later promise of God's enlargement of His people.

Theological

True or False: Isaac's naming of the third well Rehoboth (26:22), following two contested wells, credits his own persistence rather than the LORD for finally securing undisputed room to prosper.

Answer: False

This is false. Isaac's own words when naming this well credit the LORD directly with finally making room for him and his household to be fruitful (26:22), not his own persistence in repeatedly moving on from conflict. This is a meaningful shift in the narrative's tone: after two wells named for contention and hostility, the third is named for the relief and expansion God provides after a season of patient yielding. Psalm 118:5 describes this same experience in more general terms, calling out to the LORD in distress and being answered with room to breathe, and Isaiah 54:2-3 later uses the same picture of expanded space as a promise of God's future enlargement of His people. Isaac's naming of this well reflects the same posture seen throughout this chapter: whatever setbacks come first, the outcome is finally attributed to God's own initiative, not to human effort alone.

  • Genesis 26:22 (BSB)
    “He moved on from there and dug another well, and they did not quarrel over it. He named it Rehoboth and said, “At last the LORD has made room for us, and we will be fruitful in the land.””
    The third well, undisputed, and Isaac's declaration crediting the LORD.
  • Psalm 118:5 (BSB)
    “In my distress I called to the LORD, and He answered and set me free.”
    Reflects the same experience of relief and open space following a season of distress.
  • Isaiah 54:2-3 (BSB)
    ““Enlarge the site of your tent, stretch out the curtains of your dwellings, do not hold back. Lengthen your ropes and drive your stakes in deep. For you will spread out to the right and left; your descendants will dispossess the nations and inhabit the desolate cities.”
    Uses the same picture of expanded space as a later promise of God's enlargement of His people.

General

According to Genesis 26:19-21, why did Isaac name two successive wells Esek and Sitnah?

Answer: Because local shepherds from Gerar disputed Isaac's claim to the water at both sites

When Isaac's servants dig a new well and find fresh water, local herdsmen from Gerar immediately claim the water as their own, prompting Isaac to name the well Esek, meaning contention, because of the dispute (26:19-20). Isaac's household digs yet another well, and the same conflict repeats, so he names it Sitnah, meaning hostility (26:21). Isaac does not fight for either well; in both cases he simply yields the disputed water and moves on, absorbing the conflict rather than escalating it, even though the wells themselves were rightfully his to use.

  • Genesis 26:19-20 (BSB)
    “Then Isaac’s servants dug in the valley and found a well of fresh water there. But the herdsmen of Gerar quarreled with Isaac’s herdsmen and said, “The water is ours!” So he named the well Esek, because they contended with him.”
    The first well dispute, resulting in the name Esek.
  • Genesis 26:21 (BSB)
    “Then they dug another well and quarreled over that one also; so he named it Sitnah.”
    The second well dispute, resulting in the name Sitnah.
  • Genesis 13:8-9 (BSB)
    “So Abram said to Lot, “Please let there be no contention between you and me, or between your herdsmen and my herdsmen. After all, we are kinsmen. Is not the whole land before you? Now separate yourself from me. If you go to the left, I will go to the right; if you go to the right, I will go to the left.””
    Abram's own earlier choice to yield territory rather than contend, a pattern Isaac now repeats.
  • Proverbs 20:3 (BSB)
    “It is honorable for a man to resolve a dispute, but any fool will quarrel.”
    Commends the kind of restraint Isaac shows in walking away from both disputes.
  • Romans 12:18 (BSB)
    “If it is possible on your part, live at peace with everyone.”
    States the broader principle Isaac's repeated yielding puts into practice.

Theological

Isaac's response to the disputes over the wells named Esek and Sitnah (26:19-21) was to yield the water rather than contend for his rights. What broader pattern does this response reflect?

Answer: A willingness to forgo a rightful claim for the sake of peace, trusting God to provide elsewhere, a pattern already modeled earlier in Genesis

Isaac's repeated choice to yield disputed wells rather than fight for them (26:19-21) echoes a pattern already modeled by his father decades earlier, when Abram let Lot choose the better land first rather than contend over territory (Genesis 13:8-9). In both cases, giving up an immediate, rightful claim reflects confidence that God's provision does not depend on winning every dispute. Proverbs 20:3 frames this kind of restraint as honorable, contrasted with the fool who insists on quarreling, and Romans 12:18 states the broader principle at work: pursuing peace with others so far as it depends on you. Isaac's willingness to move on twice, rather than escalate either conflict, sets up the eventual resolution the chapter records at the third well.

  • Genesis 26:19-20 (BSB)
    “Then Isaac’s servants dug in the valley and found a well of fresh water there. But the herdsmen of Gerar quarreled with Isaac’s herdsmen and said, “The water is ours!” So he named the well Esek, because they contended with him.”
    The first well dispute, resulting in the name Esek.
  • Genesis 26:21 (BSB)
    “Then they dug another well and quarreled over that one also; so he named it Sitnah.”
    The second well dispute, resulting in the name Sitnah.
  • Genesis 13:8-9 (BSB)
    “So Abram said to Lot, “Please let there be no contention between you and me, or between your herdsmen and my herdsmen. After all, we are kinsmen. Is not the whole land before you? Now separate yourself from me. If you go to the left, I will go to the right; if you go to the right, I will go to the left.””
    Abram's own earlier choice to yield territory rather than contend, a pattern Isaac now repeats.
  • Proverbs 20:3 (BSB)
    “It is honorable for a man to resolve a dispute, but any fool will quarrel.”
    Commends the kind of restraint Isaac shows in walking away from both disputes.
  • Romans 12:18 (BSB)
    “If it is possible on your part, live at peace with everyone.”
    States the broader principle Isaac's repeated yielding puts into practice.